1.0 Introduction

1.1 Project Background

A key element of the Healthy Forests Initiative announced by the White House in 2002 is the implementation of core components of the National Fire Plan Collaborative Approach for Reducing Wildland Fire Risks to Communities and the Environment 10-year Comprehensive Strategy. Federal agencies and western state governors adopted the Plan in the spring of 2002, in collaboration with county commissioners, state foresters, and tribal officials. The Plan calls for more active forest and rangeland management to reduce the threat of wildland fire in the wildland-urban interface.

The Healthy Forest Restoration Act (H.R. 1904) was signed into law in December of 2003. The Act creates provisions for expanding the activities outlined in the National Fire Plan. In this same year the Nevada Fire Safe Council received National Fire Plan funding through the Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management to conduct Community Risk/Hazard Assessments in communities at risk in Nevada. The communities to be assessed are among those named in the 2001 Federal Register list of communities at risk within the vicinity of Federal lands (66 FR 160). The list identifies Nevada communities adjacent to Federal lands that are most vulnerable to wildfire threat in Nevada.

Resource Concepts, Inc. (RCI), a Carson City-based consulting firm, was selected to conduct the Community Risk/Hazard Assessments throughout Nevada. During 2004, the RCI Project Team inventoried over 250 communities in 17 Nevada counties to assess both the risk of ignition and the potential fire behavior hazard. With the use of procedures accepted by Nevada’s wildland fire agencies, these specialists focused their analysis on the wildland-urban interface areas - places where homes and wildland meet.

The specific goals of the Nevada Community Risk/Hazard Assessment Project are to:

Assess the wildfire hazards present in each community on the Federal Register list of Communities At Risk in Nevada.
Identify firefighting resource needs (equipment, personnel, and infrastructure).
Conduct fuel hazard mapping for high fuel hazard communities.
Describe recommended risk and hazard mitigation projects in enough detail to aid communities in applying for future implementation funds.
Distribute assessment results and recommended mitigation project descriptions to each county in a format that will be easily updated and useful for public meetings and other public education activities.

The community risk/hazard assessments were conducted systematically. The RCI Project Teams observed and recorded the factors that significantly influence the risk of wildfire ignition along the wildland-urban interface, and they inventoried features that can have an influence on hazardous conditions in the event of a wildfire. Interviews with local fire agency and emergency response personnel were completed to assess the availability and capability of suppression resources, and to identify opportunities for increased community preparedness. A description of the existing fuel hazard and potential fire behavior is discussed for each community. Photos and maps are presented for the communities where the fuel hazard in the interface area is high or extreme: Mark Twain, Mound House, Silver City, and Smith Valley.

The results of the assessments are formatted to facilitate ease of reference and reproduction for individual communities. A glossary of wildland fire terms is included in Appendix A. Each community is mapped and ignition risks, fire hazards, and recommended mitigation projects are described for each community. The recommendations are summarized in table form and presented on a separate map, if the proposed mitigation project can be represented spatially. These tools will aid local, state, and federal agencies in strategic planning, raising public awareness, and seeking funding for future risk and hazard reduction projects. Mitigating the risks and hazards identified by these assessments is not only crucial to the long-term goals of the National Fire Plan, but it is also crucial to the short and long-term viability of Nevada’s communities, natural resources, infrastructures, and watersheds.

Numerous agencies and individuals were involved in the planning and implementation of this effort. Special thanks and acknowledgement are given to:

Nevada Fire Safe Council (NFSC)
U.S.D.I. Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
U.S.D.A. Forest Service (FS)
U.S.D.A. Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS)
Nevada Division of Forestry (NDF)
University of Nevada Cooperative Extension (NCE)
Nevada Association of Counties (NACO)
Nevada’s Counties
Fire Chiefs and firefighters statewide

1.2 Communities Assessed

Thirteen Lyon County communities were included in this assessment:

Dayton
Fernley
Forth Churchill - Weeks
Mark Twain
Mason Valley
Mound House
Silver City
Silver Springs
Smith Valley
Stagecoach
Wabuska
Weed Heights
Yerington