Field evaluations, interviews, fuel measurements and community assessments were conducted between May 2 and June 11, 2004. The overall results of the Risk/Hazard Assessments conducted in the North Lake Tahoe Fire Protection District are summarized in Table 1-1. Hazard mapping for the North Lake Tahoe Fire Protection District is illustrated by on Figure 4-1.
Wildland firefighting suppression resources in North Lake Tahoe Fire Protection District include the following agencies:
The NLTFPD is the primary agency that responds to wildfires for the majority of the rural communities described in this plan. The NLTFPD is described in detail in this section to eliminate repetition of the information throughout this document.
The North Lake Tahoe Fire Protection District is a career fire district located on the northeast shore of Lake Tahoe. NLTFPD employs 46 career firefighters, ten volunteer firefighters, and 30 additional firefighters during the fire season. The NLTFPD protects and serves the Washoe County, Nevada portion of Lake Tahoe, covering 16 square miles. The fire district is governed by a three member board of directors. The Board of Directors generally meet once a month. Wildfire resources at any given time may be supplied from any one or more of the district’s three fire stations. A variety of equipment resources are available for fighting wildfires. Table 4-1 lists the typical equipment available from a NLTFPD station and typical response times.
Response Time |
Type Of Equipment | Amount Of Equipment |
Cooperating Partner (Resource Location) |
---|---|---|---|
10 to 30 minutes | Type I Engine Type III Engine Command Officer Type II Crew Type I Engine Type III Engine |
3 2 2 1 4 1 |
NLTFPD |
Strike Team/Task Force | 3 | Regional Chiefs | |
Type III Engine Type II Helicopter Air Attack Command Officer |
2 1 1 1 |
USFS | |
1 to 2 hours | Strike Team/Task Force Air Tankers |
1 Varies |
Regional USFS through Redding California |
2+ hours | Structure Protection Strike Teams Resources as requested by the USFS |
Regional Chiefs | |
Source: Personal Communication with Fire Chief Jim Linardos, North Lake Tahoe Fire Protection District 5-2004. |
There are numerous water storage tanks situated throughout the district. Fire hydrants are spaced within a minimum of 500 feet of structures. The water sources are either gravity fed or powered by pumps with emergency back-up generators. Water source information was obtained from the NLTFPD Wildland Pre-Incident Survey, 2003.
All of the NLTFPD firefighters have a minimum of NFPA Firefighter I and II training and wildland firefighting training (NWCG 310-1), and are trained to BLM Red Card certification. Red Card certification is part of a fire qualifications management system used by many state and all federal wildland fire management agencies that indicates an individual is qualified to fight wildland fires.
Fires are reported in the NLTPFD through the dispatch facility in Incline Village, Nevada and through 911 calls. The NLTFPD has access to the state mutual aid frequencies. Fires are communicated to fire response personnel through the use of radios and pagers. The radio system is compatible with neighboring agencies and there are no known gaps in radio coverage. There are no fire lookouts, patrols, or reconnaissance flights.
Prior to 1999, the US Forest Service Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit used the dispatch service in Minden, Nevada. The Minden Dispatch fills resource orders through the Western Great Basin Coordination Center located in Reno, Nevada.
In 1999 the dispatch service for the US Forest Service Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit were moved from the Minden Interagency Dispatch in Minden, Nevada to the Camino Interagency Dispatch in Camino, California. Currently, all resources ordered anywhere in the Lake Tahoe Basin by the US Forest Service must go through the Camino Dispatch. The Camino Dispatch fills resource orders through the North Zone Coordinating Center located in Redding, California. Orders that cannot be filled are then sent to the National Interagency Fire Center in Boise, Idaho which dispatches resources throughout the U.S. The communication system is diagramed in Figure 4-2. This process is not effective in obtaining needed resources in the Lake Tahoe basin in a timely manner as was demonstrated by the 2002 Gondola Fire.
The 2002 Gondola Fire at South Lake Tahoe illustrated the problems with the current dispatch system. Air tankers were available at the Minden Air Tanker Base but were not ordered by Camino Dispatch because Minden is located outside of California. Although the Minden tankers were the closest resource, California tankers from bases farther away were used. In addition, local Nevada fire resources were not ordered. At one point, California fire engines were responding past Nevada fire stations there were closer to the fire. The Tahoe-Douglas Fire Protection District ordered resources under the Lake Tahoe Regional Chiefs Mutual Aid Agreement. Because of the confusing dispatch system, the California Office of Emergency Services assigned request numbers to the mutual aid engines, and the Tahoe-Douglas FPD was billed for the mutual aid engines that should have responded for no charge.
In 2003, NLTFPD responded to 1,800 calls, of which 15 were fires.
The NLTFPD was established under NRS 474 and financial support comes from the ad valorem tax rate and state sales tax revenues (CTX, formerly SCCRT).
The NLTFPD has several pertinent plans, all of which are updated annually:
The district does not have a brush clearance program. The district reviews development plans to ensure compliance with the 1997 Uniform Fire Code.
The responsibility to keep a community fire safe falls on residents as well as the local fire protection agency and public agencies. The following general recommendations focus primarily on fuel reduction and defensible space efforts that residents, fire departments and public agencies can follow to increase fire safety. Recommendations also include public education and community coordination efforts. The most important consideration for successful implementation of the recommendations in this report may be for agency and landowner cooperation and coordination to ensure that the necessary fuel reduction treatments are implemented, completed, and maintained.
Defensible space treatments are an essential first line of defense for residential structures. Significantly reducing or removing vegetation within a prescribed distance from structures (typically 30 feet) reduces fire intensity and improves firefighter and homeowner chances for successfully defending a structure against oncoming wildfire. The recommendations in this report follow the TRPA approved Tahoe Fire Protection District Defensible Space Checklist and Explanation included in Appendix D.
Fuels reduction treatments are applied on a larger scale than defensible space treatments. By permanently changing the fuel structure over large blocks of land to one of lower volume or reduced flammability with a fuel reduction treatment, the expected result in the event of a catastrophic wildfire would be one of reduced capacity for uncontrolled spread through the treated area.
Fuelbreaks are necessary to slow the advance of a fire and protect resources or structures from a fire. The fuelbreaks discussed in this recommendation will aid in keeping access roads open and protect power lines. Because there are limited access points to the community, it is imperative that these be maintained to allow fire suppression equipment into the community and to provide an evacuation route if the need arises.
These fuelbreaks will also help to protect utility lines in the area. Properly maintained vegetation within power line corridors greatly reduces potential hazards, and the risk of additional ignitions, along those easements. It is important to keep power line corridors clear of flammable vegetation, especially around power poles and beneath transformers, as fires have been known to start from arcing power lines during windy conditions.
Coordination among local, state and federal fire suppression agencies is important in the day-to-day fire prevention activities and becomes critical in the event of a wildland fire. During a fire event, firefighters from other communities and states may be dispatched to areas they have never been before. This is particularly true in areas that have limited fire suppression resources and will most likely be dependent on an outside agency in the event of a catastrophic wildland fire.
Public education on making communities more fire safe is critical. Informed community members will take the initiative to lead efforts in effectively reducing the threat that wildland fires present to the entire interface community.
General guidelines for improving defensible space around residences and structures in the district are provided below.
Coordination among local, state and federal fire suppression agencies is important in the day-to-day fire prevention activities and becomes critical in the event of a wildland fire.
Figure 4-1Wildfire Hazard Classifications for the North Lake Tahoe Fire Protection District |
|
Figure 4-2NLTFPD Communication Diagram for Wildfire Suppression, North Lake Tahoe Fire Protection District |